Agnosticism
- Locked due to inactivity on Aug 4, '16 4:22pm
Thread Topic: Agnosticism
-
*and telling me
-
I have told you over and over again what you said that didn't make sense. Your response was that I was using everything you said against you.
-
This is my last question,answer it so this s--- ends.
"everything can be explained with science but it only proves religion wrong,not the existence of god.The"different" god might've created this world in a scientific way."
This is a part of my post in the last page.How can it(the part of my post in the last page)be wrong? -
Because there is no logical reason to assume that something that can be proven without the existence of a supreme being would require the existence of a supreme being.
In lamans terms, why add an extra step? Especially one that doesn't make sense? -
This thread will die now.
This thread is locked, therefore no new posts can be made.
