True Science Debunks Darwin's Macroevolution Myth
- Locked due to inactivity on Aug 4, '16 4:22pm
Thread Topic: True Science Debunks Darwin's Macroevolution Myth
-
Alter2Ego NewbieALTER2EGO -to- EVERYONE:
According to the Macroevolution Theory, the first living organism developed from nonliving matter and became the "common ancestor" of all the different forms of life that have ever existed on earth, including humans. All of this is believed to have happened without intelligent direction or supernatural intervention by God. It just happened by itself (abiogenesis). The favorite theory is that abiogenesis occurred in the ocean where amino acids formed by a long string of accidents that all happened at the right time, one after the other, defying all odds and resulting in an "organic soup" which eventually produced the "common ancestor."
The Genesis Creation Account, on the other hand, is the conclusion that the appearing of living things can only be explained by the existence of an Almighty God who designed and made the universe and all the different kinds of life on earth exactly as they are. (Sources: (1) LIFE--How Did It Get Here? By Evolution or by Creation? Pages 10-11; (2) Encyclopedia Britannica, page 1018)
As you can see, these two positions are exact opposites. Those who accept evolution theory argue that creation is not scientific. But in fairness, it could also be asked: Is macroevolution theory scientific? Which of these positions are in harmony with modern scientific discoveries?
Keep in mind that more than 150 years have passed since Charles Darwin wrote his book Origin of Species. Charles Darwin predicted that future generations would find bones showing a whale on its way to becoming a bear and bones showing a squirrel on its way to becoming a bat. As of this date, not one single fossil (bone of long-dead animals) has been found that connects one species of animals to a completely different species. This is what paleontologists (scientists who study ancient bones) have repeatedly admitted while they continue to insist all living creatures came from a "common ancestor." In other words, the scientific evidence does not support macroevolution theory.
According to the Bulletin of Chicago: Charles Darwin "was embarrassed by the fossil record because it didn't look the way he predicted it would.... the geologic record did not then and still does not yield a finely graduated chain of slow and progressive evolution." (Source: Field Museum of Natural History Bulletin, Chicago, "Conflicts Between Darwin and Paleontology," by David M. Raup, January 1979, pages 22, 23, 25)
Scientist Steven Stanley spoke of "the general failure of the record to display gradual transitions from one major group to another.... The known fossil record is not, and never has been, in accord with [slow evolution.] " (Source: The New Evolutionary Timetable, by Steven M. Stanley, 1981, pages 71 and 77)
Yet another scientist, Niles Eldredge, also admitted: "The pattern that we were told to find for the last 120 years does not exist. (Source: The Enterprise, November 14, 1980, page E9)
As you can see by the dates of the above quotations, more than 30 years have passed since they were made by pro-evolution paleontologists. Has anything changed in 30 years? Hardly, as will be demonstrated later on in this thread.
________________
"That people may know that you, whose name is Jehovah, you alone are the Most High over all the earth." (Psalms 83:18) -
...A guy in my team sports class proved evolution. He climbed the basketball board like a monkey. ._.
It was pretty awesome... -
Fossils prove evolution. Which are you going to believe, what you can see and is obviously physical and real, or what you cannot see, touch, or prove real?
-
I have a hard time believing a man created everything yet also have a hard time believing a flash of light or "Big Bang" created everything! I mean do you know how complexed your circulatory system is?
Not sure what to believe any more.... -
Is this guy still alive?
-
A flash of light ends a star's existence, so a flash of light can make something I'm sure. When a star is done with its 'lifespan' it explodes using the gases it's made of. So maybe, just maybe, there's a similar way that planets form.
-
Hikky, you stole my line.
-
Evolution is flawed. A greater beings intervention can fit.
-
Geek, that requires there be a greater being... And that you actually understand evolution.
-
Alter2Ego NewbieALTER2EGO -to- EVERYONE:
No fossils have ever been found showing ANY species or type of animal evolving into an entirely different species or type of animal.
When pro-evolution scientists claim they have evidence that evolution occurred, they're referring to "microevolution," which isn't evolution at all. It's simply adaptation of the animal to its environment. This ability to adapt is a direct result of the creature's inborn ability that Jehovah God endowed it with at the time of the Genesis creation.
In effect, so-called microevolution actually confirms the Genesis creation account which says Jehovah God created animals according to their kinds.
"{20} And God went on to say: 'Let the waters swarm forth a swarm of living souls and let flying creatures fly over the earth upon the face of the expanse of the heavens.' {21} And God proceeded to create the great sea monsters and every living soul that moves about, which the waters swarmed forth according to their kinds, and every winged flying creature according to its kind. And God got to see that it was good. {24} And God went on to say: 'Let the earth put forth living souls according to their kinds, domestic animal and moving animal and wild beast of the earth according to its kind.' And it came to be so. {25} And God proceeded to make the wild beast of the earth according to its kind and the domestic animal according to its kind and every moving animal of the ground according to its kind. And God got to see that it was good." (Genesis 1:20-21, 24-25)
The creatures are still able to interbreed with creatures that are of their kind--even when they look different from each other (eg. different breeds of dog can interbreed with one another and can interbreed with wolves because they belong to the same kind).
DEFINITION OF "MICROEVOLUTION":
"Evolutionary change below the species level; change in the genetic makeup of a population from generation to generation." (SOURCE: Biology, 7th ed. Neil A. Campbell & Jane B. Reece)
DEFINITION OF "SPECIES":
"Loosely speaking, a species is a related group of organisms that share a more or less distinctive form and are capable of interbreeding. As defined by Ernst Mayr, species are:
"groups of actually or potentially interbreeding natural populations which are reproductively isolated from other such groups."
http colon //www dot wordiq dot com/definition/Species
NOTE: Any change below the species is simply adaptation or variation of the same "kind" of creature.
________________
"That people may know that you, whose name is Jehovah, you alone are the Most High over all the earth." (Psalms 83:18) -
Let's all agree to just ignore this guy from now on.^ I mean, he's already said that he's going to ignore us.
-
Alter2Ego NewbieALTER2EGO -to- EVERYONE
Below is a comment from another paleontologist having to admit there's no evidence of macro-evolution to be found in the fossils.
"Instead of finding the gradual unfolding of life, what geologists of Darwin's time, and geologists of the present day actually find is a highly uneven or jerky record; that is, species appear in the sequence very suddenly, show little or no change during their existence in the record, then abruptly go out of the record. And it is not always clear, in fact it's rarely clear, that the descendants were actually better adapted than their predecessors. In other words, biological improvement is hard to find." (Raup, David M., "Conflicts Between Darwin and Paleontology," Bulletin, Field Museum of Natural History, vol. 50, 1979, p. 23.)
________________
"That people may know that you, whose name is Jehovah, you alone are the Most High over all the earth." (Psalms 83:18) -
I don't like ignoring people. Especially when they're wrong.
Macro evolution is literally rapidly jumping through massive changes. And that doesn't happen. And even if it did, of course you're not going to find evidence of it. IT'S KINDA HARD TO FIND TRACES OF SOMETHING THAT HAPPENED SUDDENLY. And even when we do have gaps in the time lines of certain species, that hardly means that they jumped instantly.
Ego, what are you trying to prove here?
This still doesn't point towards Creationism. You're rambling without making any actual point. -
Alter2Ego NewbieALTER2EGO -to- EVERYONE:
Below are facts to consider when dealing with macroevolution myth:
FACT 1: Just like Charles Darwin, the modern-day evolution scientific community asserts that every single animal that has ever existed came from one common ancestor aka came from a single organism (macroevolution).
FACT 2: There is no evidence in the fossils (bones of long-dead animals) proving that humans or animals evolved from completely different beings than what they presently are (macroevolution).
FACT 3: Atheists have no explanation for how the "common ancestor" came to life by itself (abiogenesis) so that evolution could then supposedly proceed. So they try to bypass that critical step by claiming evolution has nothing to do with how the "common ancestor" came to life. If they show up in this thread, you will see them doing what amounts to the usual song and dance along that line.
FACT 4: To avoid the problem of abiogenesis, members of the Religion of Atheism straddle the fence by claiming they are Christians. In that way, they can claim that God created the "common ancestor."
________________
"That people may know that you, whose name is Jehovah, you alone are the Most High over all the earth." (Psalms 83:18) -
dude 0.0 this guys obviously thought of everything!!! no way we can argue with this guys who all thesis is based on pseudo-scientific and logically flawed evidence..
except I just can't figure out how people like this explain dog breeding..
Pages:
- 1
- 2
This thread is locked, therefore no new posts can be made.
