Precision in Nature: Evidence of God or Accidents?
- Locked due to inactivity on Aug 4, '16 4:22pm
Thread Topic: Precision in Nature: Evidence of God or Accidents?
-
lulz
-
EEEGOOO
-
You do realize, Ego, that 'Barberbob the pitiful and his cheerleaders' are the whole site of GTQ, correct?XD
-
Since when have I been foul-mouthed? Excluding the douche thing, which was the "mistake" I admitted. And you still are hiding from my questions. I'll be surprised if you answer this one, actually.
-
Also, if you're ignoring all of us, that means you've lost the battle, and you're not going to deal with us anymore. You refuse to fight. You've hardly even confronted me yet.
-
If you ignore the people who are supplying answers and intelligent ways of thinking to you then aren't you ignoring the very people that you've asked to answer questions? Almost all of GTQ has already called you out on many things and has established the fact that they don't like you. Also, you keep repeating the phrase "I will ignore you" on this and another thread, yet you've answered the very people you wish to ignore several times.
-
Alter2Ego NewbieALTER2EGO -to- EVERYONE:
The reason why atheists argue so vehemently for evolution and Big Bang theories is because it gives them a convenient substitute for an intelligent Designer/God. Acceptance of both theories by atheists indicate their level of desperation in explaining how we got here and how the complex universe came into existence.
A prime example of the idiocy I've encountered when debating atheists at various websites is their willingness to believe ANYTHING--except in the existence of an intelligent Designer/God. Common sense tells us intelligent beings (humans, animals, etc.) could not have resulted from unintelligent means (a long string of spontaneous events/accidents). I have to constantly remind myself when debating an atheist that I'm not dealing with a person using common sense. I'm dealing with someone who is convinced that insults and foul language is indicative of high intellect.
Logic tells us that precision indicates deliberation. In turn, something deliberately done indicates an intelligent being intervened and guided the outcome. Just don't make the mistake of trying to use that type of logic with an atheist.
When an atheist is asked to explain how life could have come from non-life without the intervention of an intelligent God or how planets could have appeared in the heavens within their own orbits, with their individual fields of gravity, the usual idiotic response is: "Evolution" THEORY or "Big Bang" THEORY, respectively. Never mind that both theories amount to science fiction and they both rely on a long string of accidents and unguided events. The fact is that accidents cannot produce precision, because accident and precision are polar opposites.
PRECISION DEFINED:
"the quality of being precise; exactness, accuracy"
(Source: Webster's New World College Dictionary)
ACCIDENT DEFINED:
"a nonessential event that happens by chance and has undesirable or unfortunate results"
(Source: Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary)
Planets remain within their individual orbit based upon their specific fields of gravity. So clearly, gravity is essential and doesn't fit the definition of "accident." Instead, it fits the definition of "precision."
Planets have never crashed into each other, so clearly, the relationship of planets with each other is not an undesirable or unfortunate result--which likewise rules out the idea that the planets and their relationship which each other is the result of accidents. The relationship indicates precision, deliberation. Something that was deliberately done indicates the presence of an intelligent being--in this case, an intelligent Designer/God aka Jehovah.
________________
"That people may know that you, whose name is Jehovah, you alone are the Most High over all the earth." (Psalms 83:18) -
Butterflykitten NewbieIf a god made everything, then where did that god come from?
-
You're using the word accident wrong. Even in your definition, accident still requires someone to have influenced it. It isn't an accident. And it isn't precise. It is natural. Gravity is natural. Things gravitate towards each other.
We have 8 planets in our solar system. 8 planets. We have 5 dwarf planets and there is more mass in the asteroid belt and kaiper belt than there is in all of the planets combined. We have evidence to believe that our moon was formed from planets colliding early in earths life.
We can take a telescope and see stars eating each other. We can see planets that could possibly hold life. Earth isn't perfect. Our solar system isn't perfect.
Honestly, I'm not even typing this for ego any more. I'm just here to make sure no one else is dooped by his ignorance. -
NOT ANOTHER THREAD!!!
COM' ON!!!
You take trolling to a whole new level....
*Headache* -
Butterflykitten NewbieThere are very many planets. It is quite probable that at least one would have intelligent life.
-
Alter2Ego NewbieALTER2EGO -to- EVERYONE:
Logic based upon the dismissal of evidence is flawed logic--which is what atheists bring to the table. For instance, the 92 natural elements found within the Periodic Table of the Elements of planet earth are so interrelated and precise that scientists refer to it as Periodic LAW. The existence of Laws or precision indicates it was deliberately done.
Evidence of Jehovah God's existence is dismissed every single time one ignores the complexity of the natural world. Flawed logic also results from ignorance or lack of knowledge about certain scientific facts. To avoid the trap of stubbornness, one must allow logic and evidence to interact.
For instance, nobody can explain how Big Bang--which is nothing more than a theory about expanding space--could have resulted in the appearance of planets.
The millions of planets in the universe each have separate gravitational fields that keep them within their own orbits and prevent them from crashing into each other. This could not have happened by accident or spontaneously. Why not? Because the definition of "accident" is as follows:
"a nonessential event that happens by chance and has undesirable or unfortunate results." (Source: Websters New Collegiate Dictionary)
The universe shows precision. Something that is precise indicates deliberation. In turn, something deliberately done says one thing: an intelligent being intervened and directed the outcome.
Since humans clearly are not responsible for the appearance of planets in the heavens, then who did it? Somebody must have done it. God's inspired Word, the Judeo-Christian Bible responds to that question, as follows:
"{1} In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. {14} And God Went on to say: 'Let luminaries come to be in the expanse of the heavens to make a division between the day and the night; and they must serve as signs and for seasons and for days and years.' " (Genesis 1:1 and 14)
________________
"That people may know that you, whose name is Jehovah, you alone are the Most High over all the earth." (Psalms 83:18) -
>"logic based on the dismissal of evidence is flawed logic"
>Openly admits to ignoring and dismissing everything presented to disprove the rest of your thread.
What are you trying to prove here? That you are an ignorant prick? -
Alter2Ego NewbieALTER2EGO -to- EVERYONE:
Big Bang theory is nothing more than the expansion of space. It cannot explain where the billions of planets came from.
QUESTION to CONSIDER: If the billions of planets are the result of accidents or spontaneous events--meaning they created themselves--how do you explain the fact that all of the planets have different fields of gravity that keep them within their own orbits so that they don't crash into each other? Was that by accident, or design?
________________
"That people may know that you, whose name is Jehovah, you alone are the Most High over all the earth." (Psalms 83:18) -
Oh no, not this guy again.....
This thread is locked, therefore no new posts can be made.
