How To Respect Other's Religions
- Locked due to inactivity on Aug 4, '16 4:27pm
Thread Topic: How To Respect Other's Religions
-
In an environment where the people who can see me hopefully aren't illiterate and the stories of my life are well documented visually as well as through audio and not the product of verbal stories and hear say? Yes it is.
Why is it that all of God's "miracles" stopped being so spectacular when people started actually recording factual history? Why is it that God no longer manifests himself to people as soon as people actually have ways to test whether or not he's as magical as he says?
I'm under no delusion of grandeur on my own part. Only the skepticism of the validity of his. -
And what of you Geek? You're asking for proof of my existence? You worded your questions so it was the validity of myself versus your deity and then criticized me for answering it. Your criticism wasn't based on anything I said. You would have come to the same conclusion no matter how I answered your question. So were you really asking to find out? Or are you simply looking for a "Gotcha" question? A delusional hope where I'll end up saying, "Wow, I never thought of that. GOD MUST BE REAL!"
So to reverse the question, how do YOU validate the Christian God? What makes you validate that one and not any of the others? Your goal obviously isn't to convert anyone, so why do you care other than to make an ass out of yourself? -
So, did william the conqueror exist? All he has is a handful of drawing and stories.
Jesus and God played a frikkin huge part in most everything B.C. and the bible is probaly longer than any records of william the conqueror. So why does one exist yet not the other? -
I missed post 17 so therefore seem vaguely incoherent.
And the proof is pretty damn big, there should be no reason why I'd have to link to sites, and find books woth evudence as there is so much of it. -
William the Conqueror cannot be proven by the same means. And historically if evidence can be presented to disprove him, then he would be disproven. The only proof we have of his existence is that we can prove the existence of several of his companions. Family lineage or artifacts left by them gives their existence merit.
This same merit would be given to Jesus through the use of Caesar or the names of the cities if these sources had any reference to his magical powers. They don't. And since then, evidence pointing to the contrary has come to light.
The only thing that they give merit to would be his existence. As for Jesus as well as for William the Conqueror, we cannot prove the validity of their actions. -
Evidence of it, huh? Well if it's so evident everywhere, then you shouldn't have a hard time presenting some.
-
How to act like a c---: by unloving
DURHUR I'M SLANDERING PEOPLE THAT MAKES ME FUNNY LOLZ -
Carrie, if you made that book, I would by it for pure enjoyment and to give you my money.
Like bob said, why does Gods miracles suddenly disappear? Also, why (especially now) would God not show himself when there are so many unbelievers and prove himself? -
bananabread, promises of money motivates ne to do such things.
-
She is motivated by money, but I'm not allowed to pay her for anything. xD Just kidding, I love you Carri
-
THY LOVE IS ENOUGH PAYMENT HUSH
-
The time will come when Jesus comes to earth again, When you think of the around 8000 years before jesus there will likely be a longer wait than 2000 for jesus again. And miracles are happening, just on smaller level. Heck they never really were truly huge.
What your creation is based on, I remember bob saying some stuff about them and how some quarks bounced around beforecausingan explosion. The question is how the heck was there any room for it.
DING DING, there would be none.
Now comes another thing. Life.
Now, there is a rock, this rock evolves into a different type of rock, before becoming a bigger rock. Wait, wtf. So let's say that's logical.
So a rock, becomes a carrot, I know, illogical arguement right?
A rock becomes an amoeba, than a carrot. That should be more logical shouldn't it? Wait, it isn't.
So assuming all that false vacuum theory in a box with volume zero stuff is logical, there would be no life.
No I know, you are going to say "You are ignorant and made a spelling error on line 22, making your arguement stupid"
So I'll pull the next thing.
Look at what a lovely day and world it is...
Oh s---, this is a bunch of almost randomly placed stuff that looks ugly as f---...
Which is real? Option 1
This is all mostly unrelated and pulled spontaneously however I hope you get the general direction of each thing. -
The point here:
This forum is open to all people expressing their beliefs.
So horses came and expressed her beliefs: "Crying is a sin" (what she believes)
And then bob comes in "Yeah well your religion is hateful and you worship an imaginary friend."
And somehow horses is the bad guy for saying what she believes in, but bob is *just* respecting people by saying how their religion is s---.
Makes so much sense -
I didn't try to start an argument by publishing this book....
And I'm not saying I even believe in what horses was saying.
Hell, I don't even think I'm a Christian anymore.
But bob's idea of respect is jacked up, and that's all I came here to talk about.
That being said, good point Geek. I've never thought of it that way, but how would that even happen XD -
Geek, I do see your view on it, and I do know the actual scientific evolutionary chain, but until he gives me a sign to which will make me personally believe, I will be against the idea of religion.
Unloving, bob actually has a more logical way of going about this then most people. Most religious people (not saying all) have a jacked up idea of respect as well, its not only atheists.
This thread is locked, therefore no new posts can be made.
