According to science, love doesn't exist.
- Locked due to inactivity on Aug 4, '16 4:33pm
Thread Topic: According to science, love doesn't exist.
-
How depressing.
I encourage you all to research this topic on your own, as I am curioys to see what you think. -
Lol. No
-
Well science just explores the physical aspects of this universe. It cannot be used to study human emotions such as love.
At least that's what my chemistry book said. -
Love is an emotional phenomenon born of biochemical and metacognitive systems that evolved from the neccesity of dual participation in procreation and other types of domestic partnership.
Scientific method and modern technology assist us in defining what is clearly a relevant aspect in human nature. If your conclusion based on the evidemnce we gather is that it is nonexistent, then your perspective of it is most likely flawed or immature -
That isn't "love".
-
And all about that triumph above the sky of USA and Eropians, how could NASA know that it was from a nebula of a planet? They didn't see what happened, so they were just guessing. It couldn't be the real triumph-or whatever it's in English- of the angels, also NASA's theory couldn't be true.
-
Lol how do you define love then rain
-
See all words have a literal definition, and that doesn't change just because you dont agree.
-
I'm not talking about the "literal meaning". I meant something but I can't think of the f---ing English word
-
Thats called not knowing what youre talking about
-
My apologies.
-
All good
-
Hm.
This thread is locked, therefore no new posts can be made.
