sarah palin should burn
- Locked due to inactivity on Aug 4, '16 4:25pm
Thread Topic: sarah palin should burn
-
'Nuff said
-
Maybe not burn, just go away and stop talking. People like her are more or less being tuned out at this point, or rather the Republicans are forcing them off of their platform.
-
No, its because she kills wolves. -.-
She hunts them from a plane then hangs the wolf from the wing of her plane. She takes the fur to make coats or something then throws the body away. She hunts them FOR SPORT. yo, that's messed up.
Sarah palin:~
Wolves: ~
Me: ~ -
I will agree that aerial wolf hunting is pretty f---ed up. I personally have a problem with people hunting any animal for sport.
-
BoneHardDick NewbieHowever if they didn't the animal would overpopulate and destroy the food supply. Much better than killing a few animals.
-
That's almost as stupid a sentiment as the original post bonehard.
Here's some facts: yes wolves are prolific, but no, wolves do not tend to destroy their food supply. wolves are known to break into multiple packs and travel elsewhere when they put to big a strain on the prey of the area. They have even been observed to subsist on berries and shrub vegetation to allow the population of prey to regain it's foothold. -
Okay, yes I'm pissed at Sara Palin for the wolf thing, but she is a horrible person of political standards. Personally I hate when my dad or anyone kills something, but it is to control the population. Like deer for instant, if we don't have a hunting season, the deer would over populate in a fraction of years.....And I'm rambling.
-
Well I get it with deer and everything but wolves are endangered animals. One species of wolf called the mexican gray wolf only has 70 left in the wild.
-
The whole idea of "hunting to control the population" is bogus if you ask me. Just another example of mankind's arrogant attempts to regulate nature. I hate endangered species laws for the same reason, actually.
-
SecretCrocodile NewbieSo mny people worry about human overpopulation yet not animal population.
If that's not bull what is. -
Animals don't have the same capacity to harm their environment that humans do. Animals don't build 3000 square foot homes, use fossil fuels for their cars and homes, or pollute the environment with industrial waste. If that sounds a little too bleeding-heart liberal or eco-friendly for you, that's too bad, because it's a fact.
This thread is locked, therefore no new posts can be made.
